United States Department of State
Final Environmental Impact Statement
KEYSTONE XL PROJECT
Volume 2 - Figuires
26 Aug 11
http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/archive/dos_docs/feis/vol2/figures/index.htm
(Copied 31 Oct 12)
Figure 3.10.1-1 Environmental Justice (Montana)
Figure 3.10.1-2 Environmental Justice (South Dakota)
Figure 3.10.1-3 Environmental Justice (Nebraska)
Figure 3.10.1-4 Environmental Justice (Kansas)
Figure 3.10.1-5 Environmental Justice (Oklahoma)
Figure 3.10.1-6 Environmental Justice (Texas)
Figure 3.10.1-7 Environmental Justice Analysis - HPSA and MUP Designations (Montana)
Figure 3.10.1-8 Environmental Justice Analysis - HPSA and MUP Designations (South Dakota)
Figure 3.10.1-9 Environmental Justice - HPSA and MUP Designations (Nebraska)
Figure 3.10.1-10 Environmental Justice - HPSA and MUP Designations (Kansas)
Figure 3.10.1-11 Environmental Justice - HPSA and MUP Designations (Oklahoma)
Figure 3.10.1-12 Environmental Justice - HPSA and MUP Designations (Texas)
Figure 3.10.1-13 Environmental Justice - HPSA and MUP Designations (Harris County, Texas)
Figure 3.10.3-1 Major Roads, Steele City Segment
Figure 3.10.3-2 Major Roads, Gulf Coast Segment
Figure 3.10.3-3 Major Roads, Houston Lateral
Figure 3.13.5-1 Range of Reid Vapor Pressures by Crude Oil or Condensate Type
Figure 3.14.2-1 Existing Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems of the U.S.
Figure 3.14.2-2 Williston Basin Oil Production and Export Capacity, BOPD
Figure 3.14.2-3 Williston Basin Pipeline
Figure 3.14.2-4 The U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network
Figure 3.14.2-5 The U.S. Electrical Power Transmission Grid
Figure 3.14.2-6 Annual Onshore Wind Energy Potential
Figure 3.14.3-1 Texas and Louisiana Refinery SOx Emissions
Figure 3.14.3-2 Comparison of the Percent Differential for WTW GHGs from Gasoline Produced From Canada Oil Sands Relative to Reference Crudes
Figure 3.14.3-2 Comparison of the Percent Differential for WTT GHGs from Gasoline Produced From Canada Oil Sands Relative to Reference Crudes
Figure 3.14.3-4 Percent Change in Near-Term WTW Weighted-Average GHG emissions from WCSB Oil Sands Crudes Relative to Reference Crudes
Figure 4.1.2-1 Proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway Project and Planned Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansions
Figure 4.1.2-2 Historical and Projected Williston Basin Rail Loading Capacity
Figure 4.3.2-1 Major Existing Pipelines Overlying Northern High Plains Aquifer System
Figure 4.3.3-1 Steele City Segment Alternatives
Figure 4.3.3-2 Alternatives in Relation to Location of NHPAQ
Figure 4.3.3-3 Keystone Corridor Alternatives Key Aquifers and Potable Water Wells within 2-mile Corridor
Figure 4.3.3-4 Hydraulic Conductivities within the NHPAQ System and Water Wells within 2-mile Corridor
Figure 4.3.3-5 Generalized Depth to Groundwater in Nebraska and Water Wells within 2-mile Corridor
Figure 4.3.3-6 I-90 Corridor Alternatives A and B
Figure 4.3.3-7 I-90 Corridor Alternatives A and B Lake Francis Case Area
Figure 4.3.3-8 I-90 Corridor Alternatives A and B Key Aquifers and Potable Water Wells within 2-mile Corridor
Figure 4.3.3-9 Baker Alternative
Figure 4.3.5-1 Gulf Coast Segment Alternatives
Figure 4.3.6-1 Houston Lateral Alternatives
Figure 4.3.7-1 Niemi Route Variation
